Jonathan Vilma Lawsuit is Sour Grapes

Use your ← → (arrows) to browse

Why else would Gregg Williams have admitted to everything? For his health? If the evidence wasn’t any good, don’t you think Williams would have fought back? He didn’t, and the reason for that is he is dead bang guilty.

So, Vilma is trying to tell us that, despite the evidence being so good against Williams, enough for him to allocute in public, the evidence against himself is bogus? Come on now, get real Jonathan.

Is it possible that he and the players haven’t seen all the evidence? Yes, that I believe. But this lawsuit? All it is sour grapes, Vilma trying to save face.

It’s silly, take your punishment like a man Vilma.

Use your ← → (arrows) to browse
comments powered by Disqus